Sigourney Weaver Returning for ‘Ghostbusters’ Sequel in 2020


Sigourney Weaver Returning for ‘Ghostbusters’ Sequel in 2020 22

Sigourney Weaver Returning for ‘Ghostbusters’ Sequel in 2020

Source


25 Comments

Comments:

  1. > Sigourney Weaver has confirmed that she will be returning as Dana Barrett in the developing Ghostbusters sequel set for release in 2020.

    > She’s set to reunite with Bill Murray and Dan Aykroyd in the new Ghostbusters, due July 2020. ‘It’s going to be crazy working with the guys again!’ she says. She won’t reveal any details except to confirm she’s reprising her role as hauntee Dana Barrett.”

    I didn’t include the Bill Murray bit in the title because that isn’t 100% confirmed but it’s looking likely (and pretty obvious).

  2. Maybe they’re all dead, except for Dana, and they haunt/pester her into helping them recruit some new Ghostbusters to avenge their deaths.

  3. This will be like the 5th film that year where decrepit 80’s stars return for their roles “one last time”

  4. Glad to read it’s as Dana Barrett. I don’t want more weird cameos were the original cast isn’t playing their original characters.

  5. For anyone not in the know or not reading the article, it’s Ivan Reitman’s son directing the new flick. He’s the son of the original director so this has a shot at actually being a worthy successor in the franchise.

  6. Thank goodness we are completely forgetting and moving on from the horrendous all female lead movie. I watched 30 minutes trying to give it a chance and couldn’t do it

  7. Well, the reboot wasn’t a good enough cashgrab, so let’s try to cashgrab with a “true” sequel.

  8. Fucking virtue-signaling SJWs shoe-horning in female characters, *again*, ruining another movie, *again*, with no actual story reason to speak of.

    Ghostbusters should ideally be only men, maybe have the secretary come back, but that’s it. Men, and only men. Sweaty, bare-chested men, doing what they do best, in skimpy clothes, showing just exactly how manly they are.

    Maybe the shower is haunted? I could ship that. Or even better, maybe there’s a ghost who possesses bodies, but it moves from person to person through s*x!

    Yeah! That would work, especially if *all* the Ghostbusters became “infected”. At once. On a giant bed.

    Oh, I know, set the movie on Christopher St. in NYC, that way we’d see fewer women.

    In fact, let’s forget about pulling out the original Ghostbusters altogether and go with a totally nude, I mean, *new* cast.

    The s*xy scientist would be Thor (criminally underused in the reboot), the s*xy tech guy would be Terry Crews, the s*xy fraud would be Jussie Smollett, and the new guy could be some dude with a huge dick, idk.

    I think in the right hands, this could be quite the tentpole, rising above the others, strong, powerful, firm, *turgid* even, and that’s exactly the movie I think most people want to see.

    Edit: Too subtle? I think I’m hilarious.

  9. Ghostbusters 2016 was a mistake. Shouldn’t have been made and I’m mind blown it was allowed.

%d bloggers like this: